A down on her luck actress meets and equally down on his luck Jazz-pianist. They fall in love and together they muse about their futures and the dilemma of success and staying true to oneself.
The reason I like movies isn’t just about the stuff I see on the silver screen. There’s more. There’s the element of movies being a sign of the times. Easier rider, Taxi driver, Battleship Potemkin, these movies could only have been made at that precise moment in history and like a moving painting they tell the generations to come about their time.
But movies
can also be made to create a time. Every few years a new anti-apartheid movie
comes out (Twelve years a slave, Amistad,
Crash) that gambles on the slumbering knowledge that there will come a time
in de near future in which racial discrimination in the western world dies out
completely. And wouldn’t it be great if this particular movie was the final
sledgehammer against the crumbling wall?
This is one of the ways to look at Academy Awards (best picture) contestants. A correlation between a ‘sign of the times’ and the ‘changing of the times’.
This is one of the ways to look at Academy Awards (best picture) contestants. A correlation between a ‘sign of the times’ and the ‘changing of the times’.
Now; Donald J.
Trump is president of the United States of America (something liberal Hollywood
isn’t quite pleased about). More so, half the world is ablaze in some kind of
warfare.
Not really
that much more as, say, twenty years ago but nowadays we can watch the
slaughter live on youtube.
In a (somewhat) depressing world that deals out a daily dose of violence on our senses the time might be right for a happy movie for a change. Something to show the viewer that not everything is terrible; and this is where La La Land comes along. Shot well before Trump’s surprising win of the American Presidency it still works as an antidote against the darkness in the world (a sign of the times) while highlighting the changing of time.
The review
Chances of La La Land winning the lot this year are
pretty likely. Directing, editing, original score, cinematography, costumes,
acting, make-up, effects – and I’m probably forgetting some- are all of the
highest level. I think, if there is one little cloud on this star scattered
night it’s that La La Land is trying
a tad too hard.
This is
something I hated about Birdman. It
felt like that movie was ticking all the boxes to become the ‘quirky’ Oscar
hit. La La land also has this a bit.
The first
kiss happens at the exact hour mark, there’s an ambiguous ending and there are
various other formulaic moments. It
leaves a bit of an ‘oscar bait’ aftertaste in your mouth.
But then again, this movie is such a happy moment in dark times I’m more than willing to forgive it.
And If a
movie has so much fun throwing in references to olden time movies I’m the
happiest geek on the planet – I’m sure
I’m not the only one who giggled when he caught the Balon Rouge and the American in Paris reference.
The story
I’m a
script junky who keeps on hammering home one of the most basic rules of screenwriting:
keep the story simple!
Well, La La Land’s story is as simple as can
be and therefore the visual side of
things have every chance to spread its wings.
For
starters, this movie is an unapologetic old fashioned Hollywood fairytale. And
yes I completely agree with the criticism online that their characters aren’t
entirely down on their luck.
I don't
know my cars that well but the one he's driving will cost a pretty penny. And her
driving a Prius? That's not a cheap car. Not to mention that both characters
pretty much start off in a rather good position -it's not unplugging the sewers
of McDonalds or anything. And both their apartments are way roomier that my
first dorm room. So, the critical me, had a few problems taking their personal
problems seriously at the start.
I’ll also won’t deny the criticism that Hollywood should stop making movies that take place in Hollywood. There’s far more to Los Angeles than the movie business. So why make one of the characters an actress?
But the
movie has one big plus these (solid) points can fight against: La La Land is filled to the absolute
brim with charm.
Each and
every single character, shot, mise-en-scene is there to woo the audience into
the loving fiction surrounding Sebastian and Mia. You might try to stay critical, but it's like
watching a baby making happy faces: your heart just melts.
This happy
script, with warm colors in clothing and décor just wrap around you like a
comfortable blanket.
Script wise/acting wise
the movie even throws in some clever running gags to keep the audience on its
toes like Ryan Gosling’s constant ‘surprise shock’ or his hilarious car horn.
Acting
Which
brings me to the acting. Ryan Goslin and Emma Stone are two very solid actors,
no question there. And they can even sing somewhat (more about that later).
The movie
entirely depends on them and they both bring their A-game. I would have
preferred a bit more grandiose drama to suit their acting chops perhaps but
then again that’s not the material they are working with/ the movie they are
making.
That’s a
small duality in La La Land. The opening
song is grandiose in its lavishness but after that the movie becomes smaller
and smaller. I liked it but, in the end, it does make the (cold) opening song
feel a bit misplaced in retrospect.
Décor and clothing
It’s always
fun when a movie takes the extra effort to show the costumes they make.
Normally this is something reserved for the fantasy genre of movies (e.g. The Lord of the rings) or the
extravagant movies like The Birdcage.
For La La Land the choice was made
for primary colors all the way through. Which creates a great
fifties/sixties-sense not seen since West
Side Story.
La La Land relishes in it. Two good looking stars in
beautiful clothing against a wonderful sunset: simple to write perhaps; amazing to see it executed so marvelously.
However
However,
there are some nitpicks here and there in this movie. Let’s begin with a simple
one: apart from J.K. Simons there’s hardly anybody over forty with speaking
lines in the entire movie. What is this, a Millennial thing? It’s just
something that caught my eye.
Should I
read La La Land as a movie for Millennials?
Am I reading too much into it?
Second, I’m growing a bit weary with the long-take. I love, adore, the long take but if everybody is going to do it –especially now with digital effects to hide away the cuts- I fear it’s going to lose its charm.
There are
various scenes in La La Land (the
getting dressed song-and-dance-scene, for instance) that didn’t need a long
take. I would even suggest faster cuts (and closer shots) to tighten it up a bit.
So don’t overdo it, is my advice.
My third
nitpick then is one I tend to repeat: The choreography is awesome (though I do
miss Fred Astaire and the like), but what is so wrong with hiring some
professional singers to dub the voices of the actors?
For a while
now it's been a trend for movies to let actors sing themselves. And if you've
got Beyonce at your disposal -perfect, no problem. But you're not always that
lucky. La La Land lucks out with the
singing voices and the demands of the songs - but for the next time play it
safe: just do a My fair lady and dub
the voice. I'll be just as happy to pretend it's the real Ryan Gosling singing
as I'm willing to pretend he's dancing on the moon with the love of his life.
I think
this is especially annoying when you listen to the songs and realize that they
could have been even better if sung by a professional singer. I, for one, can’t
wait for the cover of A lovely night,
because the acting was great, the choreography was great, the singing –however,
not perfect, which is a shame.
Conclusion
Is La La Land a sign of the times or a wish
for a change? I think both. As always the world dreams for a better future. But it think we now start to realize once more that we can actually make it better. Maybe I'm naïve, I don’t know. I do know that this movie is the surefire Oscar winner
this year and for once in a long, long time (since the Departed – and that wasn’t even Scorsese’s best work) I
wholeheartedly agree with it.
Update: As it turns out I was wrong in my prediction. How about that?
Update: As it turns out I was wrong in my prediction. How about that?