Thursday, 29 August 2019

The limit of insanity: or why is it so difficult to get a Lovecraftian horror movie ‘out there’.

H. P. Lovecraft was a peculiar person. Apart from the short life he lived -which I won’t delve into- he created a mythos so delicate, yet, so utterly unworldly incomprehensible that the best word scholars found to describe it was: insanity!

It’s what happens when you ‘allow’ your mind to flow. When you allow yourself to think the ‘big thoughts’.

(Per example) What’s behind the universe? The expanding universe has to expand into something, doesn’t it? Then, if the universe is so immensely grand, where is God? And, more importantly, if God exists –and he is ruling over all those different galaxies- what would such a mighty being think about us: this silly group of mammals on this silly little planet of ours on the outskirts of the universe. Would he spare us a moment’s thought?

It’s when you start thinking big, horror comes to creep. (Taking the above examples as scripture) God doesn’t care about us. He’s got other things on his eternal mind. We are alone...and the ‘lesser’ Gods want us.

This is, pretty much, the mindset you have to get into when thinking about Lovecraftian horror. Basically the man created a mythos of Gods and eternal beings that surpass us humans in every single way (intelligence, bravery, valour). Whatsmore, these beings aren’t bothered by human traits like compassion, self-sacrifice or heroism.

In short: Lovecraft has created a world of nemesis that simply cannot be defeated. When ‘his’ monsters from the dungeon-dimension come to show the only chance humankind has is to roll over and give in.

And that’s the point I’m making!

Hollywood has tried to make Lovecraftian horror movies but most of these movies always fell short of the ending. One can’t win in Lovecraftian horror. The end is predestined, bleak and final. You can’t escape your doom.

Hollywood doesn’t like this. Even in the cruellest of horrors the ‘heroes’ need to have a fighting chance. That’s why each and every slasher ends with ‘the final girl’ surviving. That’s why the cruellest ‘torture porn’ movies (Hostel, Saw 3-7) end with a shimmer of hope that, at least, one ‘good’ soul survived.

There are only a handful of horror movies that end bleakly. And even the bleakness in (most of) those movies only relates to the main characters. Never the entire world.
Just some examples to prove my point:
  • Pet Semetary: ends with the main character kissing his undead wife. Then –as the credits roll- you hear her slaughtering her husband.
  • The decent: ends with the main character escaping the cave only to find out that she’s still inside and that she’d been hallucinating. The creepers are crawling towards her and the movie ends.
  • Rosemary’s Baby: ends with Rosemary cradling her infant child. The destroyer of worlds. But then the movie ends.
  • The blob (the remake): ends with a priest who still has a canister of ‘the blob’. This substance could destroy the world. But the movie ends before it is released.
  • Rings: ends with Samara’s ‘home movie’ uploaded to the internet. But then the movie ends.
Two things to take from this: one, in the example of Pet Semetary and The Decent the havoc this evil will wreak upon the world is minimal. The creepers of The Decent will stay in their cave and the undead won’t wander too far from Pet Semetary. The evil is contained.
In the example of The blob, Rosemary’s baby and Rings, however, the evil is on the verge of omnipresence. This evil could strike the entire world.

But...what do Hollywood movies do? They roll the credits and call it a day (Phantoms).
I argue that Lovecraftian horror not only promises world annihilation but also delivers on its promise. And it is in this delivering that Hollywood is too afraid to (uhm) ‘deliver’.

This is a strange concept to realize as Hollywood gleefully destroys the world (or New York, at least) on a yearly-summer-blockbuster schedule. But then there is a difference between fighting against an opponent you can win from and fighting against the ‘ancient Gods’ who are unstoppable.

One of the reasons why The cabin in the woods was such a success (apart from the fantastic third act) was because the movie allowed itself to play the Lovecraftian card though out (even though it didn’t use the elements). The secondary storyline throughout the movie was to keep the ‘old Gods’ at bay. Once that failed inevitability came to play.

This makes In the mouth of madness such an unique Lovecraftian movie just because it uses all the elements of the writer and, above all, shows humanity’s end.

So, in the future, if Guillermo Del Tore decides to take on Lovecraft for his next project we can expect one thing: things won’t end happily. The question, however, remains, will the producers let him?

No comments: