Tuesday 26 March 2019

Love, death and Robots - ranking the episodes

Lust Love, Torture Death and Sometimes Robots is an animated series that plays around with the supernatural and the technological. Not all episodes are as solid as others which made me compile this little list.

(Short) Reviews
First I'll shortly describe each and every episode; after which I'll give you a top three (and a bottom top three while I'm at it).

Sonnie's Edge
The first episode is a great opener. The graphics are amazing, the voice-acting practically flaweless. It makes you appreciate how far we've come since the days of Animatrix.
The plot itself, however, is a bit predictable (plus the obvious lesbian sex scene keeps reminding you that you are watching Netflix - more on that in a moment). But that shouldn't bother anybody since the bulk of the episode is just monsters smashing into each other.

Three robots
Three bickering robots on a tour through a post-apocalyptic city we humans left behind. The end twist is fun. But most of all this episode hinges on robots trying to understand us silly humans -which they can't. This could become an ongoing series of these three robots trying to make sense this ancient human civilization.

I didn't really enjoy the voice-acting/dialogue though. But I can't really put my finger on it.

The witness
And here we are at the Netflix-par-excellence episode. Storywise this is the weakest of the bunch. You can guess how it's all going to go down one minute into the episode. The rest is just a naked woman (and, thus, to even things out, the obligatory penis appearing as well) running around.
This episode felt more to make of showing some flesh than it was to tell an intriguing short story. The visual style is nice though.

Suits
Reading the title and seeing a farmhouse as the very first shot I was expecting some M.I.B. shenanigans. But this episode offers far more.
The animation style takes a minute to get accustomed to but once you do you are in for a fun ride with explosions and the lovechildren between The Mist and Starship Troopers.

Sucker of souls
oldschool 2D anime (western at least) animation. A lot less robots in this one; but a lot more gore. This episode is the male fourteen-year-old daydream fantasy in the flesh as it were. Just the tiniest of plot to move things along and to get the bloodsplatter going.

When the yogurt took over
Six minutes. The shortest episode of the bunch and one of the silliest (that is; if you stick to the metaphor of yogurt). I didn't really enjoy the animation, a bit too cheaply made on the character department. But the story was intriguing enough to spark a series of possible narratives.

Beyond the Aquila rift
Some spectacular 3D animation here. This episode proves two things. First, that we are very, very close to actually creating 100% looking humans on a computer. And, two, that this is a story that can only be told by using the powers of animation.
Sure there might be some live-action way; but reality simply can hold a candle to the imaginative powers of animation.
Beyond the Aquila rift is one of the best episodes of the series (even with the shoehorned sex scene - really Netflix?).

Good hunting
Steamboy (2004) style animation this time with a Steampunk-story set in Hong Kong. Moreover it features the ancient legend surrounding foxes (that's as far as my knowledge of that particular legend goes).

I was kind of hoping for a lovestory between a hunter and a prey. Instead I got the 'other' famous story about hunters and prey.
Still, what I got was very well executed with a minute eye for detail in the animation. Still I prefer the innocence of Steamboy over the harshness of Good hunting.

The dump
And another d*ck joke. By now it's becoming rather obvious that Love, death and robots is a bit uneven. Some, horror or Sci-fi but sometimes it feels like the smallest of stories is used as an excuse to throw some animated nudity your way. Like The witness, there's not always a need.

Still The dump reminded me of the Tales from the Crypt episodes of the early nineties. Which is a good thing. And the animation style was comical enough not to take the episode too seriously (like anybody could).

Shape-shifters
And, as usual, whenever you make a statement a show immediately proves your point. In Shape-shifters (or 'Dog Soldiers:the sequel') there's actually some functional nudity.

Because this episode takes place at a military compound in the Middle-East each and every American soldier has a bob-cut. This, however, automatically highlights the facial features (especially during daytime). Which is one of the things 3D animation hasn't fully managed yet.
Especially in 20 to 40-so people. Very young and very old people are easier to animate.


So the limits of realistic human animation is front and centre in this episode. Still, when night falls and the protagonist starts investigating (some very clever shots here) the story wins you over and you are in for a brutal thrill-ride.

Helping hand
As I said above; realistic human 3D of young people doesn't really work but it helps if it is night (or the vacuum darkness of space). A nice little story this time around which toys around with some real science concerning action/reaction.

Fish night
A more fantastical episode (that ended a bit more brutally than it should). The animation style is fitting for the story it's telling. The bright colours help to sell the fantastical aspect. The story, however, is -well- practically translucent.

Lucky 13
A sentinel ship. This episode is more drama than action, gore and lewdity. It is about a love between a pilot and her ship. It works just like those stories about Seacaptains knowing their boats. When the trust between the machine and the human is there they will look out for each other. And in Lucky 13 this concept works like a charm.

Zima Blue
Square, square, square! A throwback to the philosophical (drug fuelled) Sci-fi novels from the seventies Zima Blue is the more 'out there' episode of the bunch and therefore the most divisive. I didn't really enjoy the spiritual motive it tried to force on the audience, nor did I like the chosen animation style.
This episode is the one people online like to praise best. I disagree! I think this episode was trying at best.

Blindspot
One of the sillier episodes. Basically it feels like a mix between Solo: A Star Wars Story and Pokemon. It's silly fun (and the animation takes a little getting used to) but overall a happy crime-caper of a story. Alas it is also easily forgotten.

Ice age
And suddenly a (mostly) live-action episode.
And one of which I'm certain I read the original story once.

I really enjoyed this episode because of the humour, chemistry between de leads and the whole absurdity of it all. I would definitely love me a refrigerator like this.

SPOILER: I'd put in a Lego doll and watch the little people worship it as a deity.

Alternate histories
The title alone grabbed me - then I was rewarded with some of the strangest Hitler shenanigans I've ever witnessed (and I saw Hitler on ice in The history of the world part I). This is one weird, weird episode of which I kinda wished they played it straight. Still the whole Hitchhicker's guide to the galaxy vibe (and seeing Hitler die six times over) made up for it a little.

The secret war
Saving the best for last. If there's one thing the Russians are very, very good at it is computers. This computer animation proves it! Making usage of the mysterious felled forest in the Ural and the occult rage of the early twentieth century, The secret war concocts a visually stunning story of a Soviet platoon's last stand against the beasts of the underworld.

Ranking
so there you have it! 18 short episodes quickly reviewed. Which did I prefer? Strangely enough it are the more photorealistic animations I liked best. So here's my top three:

3. Sonnie's edge
A visually stunning episode that features an amazingly choreographed death match. It uses violence and sex as a motive instead of something for the perv’s to ogle at.

2. Ice age
Because this story was so enjoyable without any 'real' consequences. I never thought I would enjoy mass-extinction so much.

1. Beyond the Aquila rift
The sex-scene is a bit forced in there but beyond (ha!) that this episode brings forth an amazing little tale that makes fine good usage of the animation possibilities.

So those are my top pics; which then, to me, are the bottom-dwellers?

3. Zima Blue
I simply couldn't be bothered by it, nor did I enjoy the visual style. A shame really because if the episode bothered to be less forced philosophical it might have brought its point across better.

2. Alternate histories
'Killing Hitler' has been a though-exorcise for ages now. And even though I understand the joke behind it this episode simply could've been far better.

1. The witness
Sometimes, playing something straight doesn't pay off either. The witness is too reliant on its twist (which is obvious) and therefore feels like a weak excuse to have the protagonist running around with no clothes on. The animation is good though.

Luckily there are far more better episodes in Love, death and robots than there are bad ones. Still a lot of the episodes feel like a technical achievement of pulling off awesome animation instead of telling a truly fulfilling story. Maybe that's something the show might want to tackle in the future.

Stranger Things season 3 - Speculations.

The trailer of Stranger Things: season 3 just landed and I’ve spent the last thirty minutes before writing this article thinking about all kinds of possible scenarios that could play out. In short it is the same game I played before with Lost and It; what will happen - what might happen.

My three sources of information are the poster, the trailer and the episode titles (and some promotional mumbojumbo from the Duffer brothers). So I might as well tackle them separately.

I won't go into the hidden messages and clues from the Behind the scenes book that got published last year.

The poster
Let’s discuss the poster first: Everybody is looking at the fireworks except Will, Eleven (Jane) and Mike. Mike is looking at Eleven whilst she and Will are looking at the camera which, in turn, emits some kind of reddish tentacles. The camera is the POV of villain here.

The kids are all dressed in summer clothing, there are fireworks; it’s obviously the 4th of July celebrations (the Cancer starsign?).

What’s interesting is the fairground with the Ferris wheel in the background, this contraption appears in the trailer as well.

So, knowing this let’s talk about the trailer.

The trailer
First impression tells me the show is going to be a lot more funky 80s colours than it ever was before. Taking place in the summer we’ve got bright coloured T-shirts, high white socks and (as the short montage goes) some highly coloured sets taking place in the Starcourt mall.
What else can we safely deduce from the trailer? Let’s go by character:

Dustin
Dustin has been to summer (computer) camp (as his T-shirt suggest). He just returned and believes his friends forgot about him.

Speculation –It’s still a mystery where Dustin’s father is. One can assume some kind of custody thing or (perhaps) the father is military. If this is the case it isn't a long shot to see his father getting involved in all of the Stranger Things.

It took me a while before I remembered it; but the kids raising that antenna in the ‘field’ is
a lot like that statue 'Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima'.
Something tells me that the showmakers wanted to use the
American 4th of July celebration as a motive throughout the season.

Nancy and Jonathan
Nancy and Jonathan show up for one single short shot and they are both dressed rather ‘adult’-like and look nervous.

Speculation – They can’t both be having a job interview. So, the first thing that popped into my mind was the end to ‘The Graduate’. Is Nancy pregnant?
But, to be honest, this shot could mean anything. I don’t put too much stock into the fact that this shot follows directly after the reveal of the new location: 'The post office'. Not with all those diploma’s hanging on the wall behind them.

Mike/Eleven and Max/Lucas
The younger couples are also still coupled up, by the way; Max and Lucas are seen leaving together leaving Dustin behind. And Mike and Eleven are sharing yet another kiss. Mike hardly appears for the rest of the trailer - is he going to be underplayed again?

Steve
Steve has a job working at the mall (as the teaser trailer highlighted).
Steve is probably getting more fun this season. From the king of the school he is now the kind caring doofus for his young friend Dustin.

Speculation - And I’m sure he’ll get the girl (Robin) he’s working with. I mean if you escape together by sliding down an escalator you wind up together.

Steve does get injected with some blue stuff at one point in the trailer (more speculation about that later).

Hopper and Joyce
Hopper talks, but to 'who' is 'Speculation'.

Speculation -  Even though Hopper and Joyce aren’t seen together one might assume that they end up together as well. That’s one of those will-they, won’t-they cases that has been going on long enough. And now that Bob has left the building...

The mayor
There is something wrong with the mayor, that’s for sure. Played by the (he plays a villain so very well) charming Cary Elwes he’s chewing scenery in his one shot. But then again, that shot is juxtaposed by protesting civilians holding signs against the mayor. So his character is doubious.

Billy
Then, there’s Max’s stepbrother Billy who just can’t keep his shirt on –but, then, he is a lifeguard after all. Now he’s in the shower discovering some upside-down-std.

Speculation - But, and here is the question, it could also be a red herring, maybe the arm is Steve’s since he got injected by some blue stuff.

The creepy guy
There’s some creepy guy with a gun looking very impressive. Something tells me he is one of those unstopable villains.

Speculation – I he chasing Eleven?

Hopper, by the way, is -at one point in the amusement park- holding the gun of the creepy guy (with silencer and everything).

Speculation – Assuming the creepy guy isn’t on Hopper and Eleven’s team he’s sent to kill somebody. But to prove somebody is evil he/she has to kill a lesser character to prove this. This doesn’t bode well for Owens’ or Bauman who happens to be at the fair as well.

Gasmask guy
A gasmask guy gets blown away by some Tesla coil machine and, pretty much, burns to a crisp so he’s probably a minor character just there to emphasize how dangerous this new danger is.

Lucas’s sister
Lucas’s sister is seen crawling through the airvents John McClane-like.
There is at least one scene which involves Steve, Lucas’s sister, Robin and Dustin being chased by something in the mall.

Will
Will, is, as always, mysterious. When you think about it you know less about him and his experiences in the upside-down than Eleven (Jane).

Throughout the trailer he’s often found on the side of the group. Only at one moment is he seen soaking wet from the rain and crying over the Ghostbusters photograph.
Something dramatic happened just before that because you see a reaction shot of Will in the rain later in the trailer.

Speculation - Did he just have a fight? With Mike?

Al we know is that it’s him and Eleven looking at the camera on the poster.

But, I also happen to know that the Duffer brothers (as they said) decided to give the boy a break this year. So no coughing up slugs for poor Will. But that doesn’t mean he doesn’t get a part to play.

I always considered Will and Eleven the two pillars of Stranger Things. Him being the well raised and behaved boy thrown into a bad world. Her; the badly raised, anti-social girl thrown into the good world.

So I wonder what will happen to Will.

Eleven
Which brings me to Eleven (Jane). She’s accepted by the group (and friends with Max), still has her nose-bleed-powers plus there is some funky stuff going on at a beach.

Eleven is always the character that gets to do the coolest shots like: destroying a ghost bathtub or wearing an American flag as a blind-fold in front of a freezer full of Eggo’s.

Speculation - I specifically wonder how her vocabulary has improved. Can she speak full sentences now?

The titles
Knowing all this, let me try to explain the titles this season brings.

1) Suzie, Do You Copy?
The only Susan I know of on the show is Max’s mother. The Do you copy-part can refer to Dustin or Sherriff Hopper talking on the walkie-talkie.

2) The Mall Rats
Obviously there’s a new mall in town and the kids get to hang around there. Also there could be a 'rat'/monster lurking.

3) The Case Of The Missing Lifeguard
Who’s the lifeguard this season? Billy. The trailer pretty much confirmed that he’s not going to be happy about his new tattoo (But it could still be Steve).

4) The Sauna Test
I assume Scott Clarke (Mr. Clarke) will have something to do with this. Also, I assume, that since, in season 2, the mind-flayer didn’t like heat very much this episode will feature a literal sauna and
somebody undergoing a test there; drive the demon out as it were (Billy?).

5) The Source
Episode five, about time the pieces fall into place. Maybe the kids decide to take on the source (and lose, discover something else –because it is only episode five after all).

6) The Birthday
Whose birthday? My guess is Jane’s.

7) The Bite
The death of a mayor character I’m calling it. Penultimate episode, Game of Thrones-style.

8) The Battle Of Starcourt
The mall is called Starcourt so that’s where the showdown is. Also, if memory serves, Starcourt had something to do with He-man as well, but I could be mistaken.

The fun part of promos.
Of course the fun part of promotional material is to entice. Throwing a whole lot of questions into the mix only enhances this. This is what I like about the promotional material of It; what I liked about Lost and what I even like about the new Aladdin trailer (truly; what’s wrong with a blue Will Smith?). It leaves the audience guessing!

Mary Poppins Returns - a review

Mary Poppins is back to help the Banks' children once more. Michael Banks -all grown up- is in a spot of trouble and it is up to Mary Poppins to guide the family once again.


Making a sequel to a masterpiece is a daunting task. The question is if you want to play it very safe, safe or be bold. It’s the scale from The Hangover: part II (the same movie yet in the different setting) ranging to The Sting II (changing a few things –for the worst- but still use the same structure) to Highlander II: The quickening (throw out everything and start again).

You’ll notice that I noted some ‘reasonably bad’ movies here. That’s because, when you are dealing with a downright classic of the calibre of Mary Poppins (1964) it is very easy for a movie to turn out a monstrosity. Luckily Mary Poppins Returns is no Highlander II. But, by playing it too safe it also doesn’t really have an own voice.

Follow the blue-print.
Mary Poppins Returns, I argue, doesn’t truly overdo itself with computereffects (at least not noticeably) and it certainly has the heart in the right place. But, at the same time it is also a rehash of what made the original movie practically perfect in every way. Basically Mary Poppins Returns feels more like showstopper song and dance numbers one after the other than the original ever was. The storyline gets muddled by this.

It like the moviemakers were in a pickle:

‘first we need to include the animation sequence, then the lamplighters dance routing, oh and don’t forget the crazy cousin on the ceiling bit’

‘and how are we going to stick all these storylines together?’

‘We’ll think of something about a missing piece of paper or something.’

Can't help but compare.
One can’t help to compare this movie to the original. In fact, the movie wilfully challenges you. But by doing so the faults of the sequel become apparent. One of the things that made the original great was that the father (and mother, certainly) was portrayed as an uncaring, unloving man in the first two acts of the movie. Only in the end, during that lonesome walk towards the bank, is this façade of the man destroyed to show the good father that was underneath all along.

In Mary Poppins Returns, however, there is no need for the father, or any character to change. So, as some sort of desperate measure the movie actually includes a villain (the original didn’t really have villains).

Also the message of Mary Poppins Returns steps a bit on the message of the original. Michael originally didn’t want to invest the money in the bank. He wanted to give it to people who needed it: the birdlady first and later -in his hour of need- his father. Now in the sequel it turns out that Michael’s father invested the money after all and that saves the day. So, the way I see it, that scary bankers song of the original is somehow suddenly proven morally right.

Time change.
Times change; that’s a given. I would argue that we’ve already gotten a great Mary Poppins sequel in both Saving Mr. Banks and the Nanny McPhee-films. Especially the latter is saved from the aforementioned blue-print of cramming ‘fan favourite’ scenes into the movie because it can tell its own tale.

Maybe I grew up (always a bad sign) but the sequel pretty much has Mary Poppins returning to help one particular family over and over again. They live in a very good-to-do part of London, they love each other very much. Why do they need Mary Poppins here? Why doesn’t float down to another family that has some real problems?

Is she in it?
The final critique is the ‘will he/she be in it ploy’. Skyfall famously had a small part reserved for Sean Connery. And Mary Poppins Returns certainly has a spot Julie Andrews. Alas the actress couldn’t take the part. So the movie opted for the indestructible Angela Lansbury. The point is, however, why write this scene without a back-up plan. No matter how much I adore Angela Lansbury (and I certainly do) her cameo still feels like a second choice. Espescially if Dick van Dyke did manage to appear.

My backup plan would’ve been to simply change the elderly lady at the end for a younger woman. Then there’s no me in the audience knowning the moviemakers couldn’t get Julie.

Still a good kids movie.
Still, in the end, kids won’t be bothered by this. Kids will probably love this movie because it is so lovingly made with bright colours to boot.

This has everything to do with the casting. The style of the movie, after all, is meticulously recreated from the original so, putting it very bluntly, all creative credit goes to the geniouses behind the original movie.

No! Casting here is key, if the actors can’t hold a candle to the original the movie plummets. Luckily that isn’t the case. Emily Blunt is wonderful as the titular character eventhough she is more often than not in the back of the scene instead of front and centre (which, in the original, again, only happened in the third act).

The real find is Lin-Manuel Miranda as Jack. Dick van Dyke has charm the over (even at 90+). Miranda is certainly competing to equal him. A bit underwritten and often used as an out the blue spark to force the story into the next song and dance routing still the actor plays the character wonderfully. He’s the believer friend the children need on their silly adventure. And he actually manages to keep the same job throughout the movie.

The children then are charming and sweet. Basically in this particular movie the kids only need to laugh and be amazed. They’re certainly up to the task.

I love that moment when the smallest child unwraps his candy in the bank
– he’s looking left at somebody off screen like: ‘is the scene over yet?’.

Finally there Ben Whishaw as Michael Banks all grown up. I’m not really certain if it is a wise choice by the movie to have his character a widower but it does allow for a series of sweet scenes for the actor to sink his teeth in.

Colin Firth was originally cast as the voice of Paddington the bear.
Now Firth gets to do some voice-acting in this movie AND he’s playing opposite his replacement.

His character is a bit unevenly written but whatever scene Whishaw is in his doggy-eyes capture the moment.

To end with the songs. Mary Poppins Returns is a musical after all. Short answer: they are all utterly forgettable. It’s the visuals you remember not the songs. So there’s a whole scene underneath the sea; I can’t remember, for the life of me, what they were singing.
I know that the songs were sweet and lovely (Whishaw’s song was lovely) and fitted the scenes, but that’s about it.

In the end Mary Poppins Returns will be remembered like other sequels to great original movies like Force ten from Navarone or 2010. All good movies, and certainly not the fate bestowed on the likes of The Sting II. But never as great as the original.

Mixed Tape Movies: Mobsters

In the eighties it was the-thing-to-do to make a mixed tape (like an mp3 but touchable, always in need of a pencil and definitely cooler). On it you would make a little playlist of all the cool songs. Now the trick was to make each song correspond with the rest of the tape. In this post I will try to do the same with movies.

Every once in a while I will select a general topic and select movies to accompany it. As you can see the more child-friendly movies are at the start of the day, but  when night falls: ‘here be monsters’. Please feel free to give suggestions of other unknown movies.

One rule though: Auteur themes like ‘Shakespeare’ or ‘James Bond’ are not allowed. ‘Spy-movies’, naturally, are.

Theme: Mobsters.
I've always been a sucker for the fictional 'good' criminals. The Robin Hoods of this world that steal from the rich and give to the poor. Mobsters are the opposite of that; they are vile and evil and they know it! Yet ,somehow, alongside the bloodshed they leave behind these villains (in movies at least) care deeply about friendship, family, tradition and respect. Its this grey area that always struck me as intriguing in the mobster genre.

08:00-10:00
Bugsy Malone: One of my favorite childhood movies was The phantom kid (1977) –completely unfindable nowadays. The movie was a western with an all children cast. I loved this movie to bits.

Then, when I was ‘round about ten’ I saw Bugsy Malone. It’s a lesser movie to me, too childish – even for a child. But then again it did have Jodie Foster portraying the ultimate dream girlfriend (that is, until I realized that she was quite a bit older than me). Nevertheless, Jodie will always be in my heart.

10:00-12:00

Little miss marker: This is one of the few movies in which the remake is better than the original. Walter Matthau and Julie Andrews (and Brian Dennehy and Tony Curtis) are brilliant in this sweet tale about a hustler accepting a young child as a bet-marker.

If you are ever feeling down this is the movie to watch. Just that horse-race-scene alone.

12:00-14:00
Oscar: An often criticized movie, and I don’t understand why. The moment Tim Curry’s character bellows his naïve ‘Hellooou!’ you just have to be giggling. And that’s way after (immortal?) Kirk Douglas slapping Rambo in the face.

Arnold Schwarzenegger tried his hand at comedy with Kindergarten cop (which is also a brilliant thriller in the last act) and Junior. Sly did the same with Oscar and Stop or my mom will shoot! The latter we’ll just pretend never existed. But Oscar should have more credit than it is usually given.

Based on an old stage farce it is a hilarious movie that never denies its origins and –in case you are wondering- Sly Stallone is perfect in the part of the mob boss trying to give up being a mob boss. 

14:00-16:00
The Sting: The Sting just has to be on this list! This is one of the few movies that actually gets hurt the minute you watch the sequel. Just don’t!

Redford and Newman are perfect as always as they try to cheat a local mob-lord out of his money. True the plot takes a few side-roads at times (the whole sudden assassin plotline) that just don’t work. But in the end it is the ultimate conman movie that still has to be surpassed (Ocean’s eleven [the remake] came very close).


16:00-17:00
The untouchables: A very polished movie for today’s standards that walks the narrow line between the real-life story of Eliot Ness and the fantastical. Especially the style of the various sets (very reminiscent to those old-time Dick Tracy comics) and, of course, the explosive portrayal of Al Capone by Robert de Niro make this movie.

17:00-23:00
The Godfather Trilogy: The classic! A full shelve of books have been written about these three movies (or one big movie, to be honest). The original movie never mentions the word ‘Mafia’. But then the Don liked the first movie so much that he allowed the word to be used in the sequels.

Then there’s the reason the third movie is the lesser of the three is because Robert Duvall (with reason) didn’t want to appear in it.

After all, the first two movies are a big buildup to a confrontation between Michael and Tom.

So we got to see that Sophia Coppola can’t act if her life depended on it (poor woman – but then again she’s is a very impressive director with an unique interest in stories to tell). But also Andy Garcy playing what he does best: an arrogant smuck that you –can’t help yourself to- love.

The story of the Corleone family is a brilliant watch. Al Pacino never surpassed his performance as he did in the second chapter. Marlon Brando used his screen-presence to the max and suffered a slow carreer death afterwards. And Diane Keaton shows the world of women what a woman is capable of in a world of men.

The Godfather trilogy is a must watch for anybody who loves film. Go into it blank and then, and only then, read up about what went on behind the scenes. 

23:00-01:00
Road to Perdition: Tom Hanks as a villain! What more; Paul Newman as a villain. And yet, I would call neither such. Based on a (brilliant) graphic novel Road to Perdition this underrated Mendes forte explores the themes of love and honor amongst thieves.

Sam Mendes is always a daring director and Road to Perdition proves this. This movie is a thrilling story about the love between an father and son. A love that, under the circumstances will only end in blood.

01:00-03:00 
Goodfellas: When talking about mobsters one has to talk about Scorsese. Casino and The Departed might have been his new Magnus Opi (yet, I always preferred The Aviator). It was Goodfellas that showed this strange concoction between ‘cool to be a mobster’ and ‘the pure insanity of it all’.

Relying heavily on Joe Pesci’s performance Goodfellas shows that ‘wanting to be a Goodfella’ is the equivalent of bathing yourself in the blood of the criminally insane. This insanity explains the Henry Hill character in the end – when all are dead.

Honourable mentions:
There are, of course, numerous mobster movies that I've forgotten to include in this list. But, luckily for me, a lot of mobster movies also use different themes that I might be able to highlight in a future article.

We own the night: Four brothers: Utterly forgettable. The only reason I put it here is to remind myself that this movie exists and that I’ve seen it four times. What is it about? I can’t remember.

Donnie Brasco: A brilliant movie with strong performances. But it cannot hold a candle against the movies in this list (nor to Scorsese’s The Departed – which has the same story).

The Departed: A brilliant movie but less about mobsters and more about spying and cat-and-mouse-games. The same goes for Eastern Promises.

Scarface (the original): The true mobster blueprint. But like cars getting more advanced over the years so did this blueprint. Scarface is still a great movie if you are willing to accept that a lot of the things you’ll see have been reused in later movies.

Scarface (the remake): The ultimate gangster-movie. And for that sole reason I excluded it from the list. I wanted to talk about ‘classical’ mobsters, not modern day gangsters. The Scarface-character in this movie isn’t about the ‘inner circle’ of family and friends. Scarface’s – Tony Montana- is all about himself.  And he is willing to accept all kinds of sacrifices to get to his goals.
Scarface, therefore, wouldn’t feel out of place in a sociopath-topic.

Carlito’s way – Again an ex-criminal getting dragged back into crime. Even though this movie has one of the best endings ever to grace the silver screen I had to exclude it due to time constraints.  That and the fact that I preferred the paternal love of Road to Perdition over the stupid friend from Carlito’s way.