Sunday 28 July 2019

Stranger Things 3 – a review

Another year has passed and once again Mike Wheeler and his friends think that everything is hunky-dory again in the sleepy town of Hawkins. How wrong they are! Dormant evil is reawakened as vile forces try to reopen the gateway between this world and the upside-down. And the beast that lurks there has made his own plan for what’s to happen next.

Stranger Things is back with a vengeance! After two stellar seasons the show hasn’t lost any of its momentum. The main trick behind this success is the balance this show manages to strike between ‘what we know’ and ‘what we think we know’.

The first one is easy: Eleven (or El as she will from now on be called) will get several nosebleeds. Steve will get his behind kicked once again. Hopper and Joyce will continue their will-they-won’t-they routine (but never annoyingly so). And Mr. Clarke will explain some science along the way.

Yes, Mr. Clarke (Randy Havens) is back. He is the born teacher willing to give all his time to anybody who is interested. And, of course, Mr. Clarke is into D and D and painting ‘The lord of the Rings’ like elves and whatnot. Mr. super nerd is awesome! What happened to his girlfriend from season 1 though?

These are the scriptural tropes that the show runners just have to include each season, it’s tradition by now.

But Stranger Things wouldn’t be Stranger Things if it didn’t take some age-old narrative tropes from yesteryears’ movies and turn them ‘upside-down’. No, the hero might not get the girl. And, no, the ordeal the gang is facing might not reach the happy conclusion of many-an Amblin film.
This keeps Stranger Things fresh whilst, at the same time, deeply rooted in a pleasant sense of nostalgia.

Back to the past.
As always Stranger Things season 3 is filled to the brim with references of both the actual era and the pop culture at the time. It’s 1984 now, the colourful time of the ‘80s have truly arrived.

The rain and fall of seasons previous have been replaced by summer and the fourth of July celebrations. Out are all the dark jackets and grey woollen sweaters and in are the multicoloured hair bands, T-shirts and shorts. It’s a long hot summer and the show wants you to know that.

Not only by making it several plot-points (e.g. the monster not really liking the heat or) like Mrs. Wheeler feeling the heat

Mike’s mother is on the brink of a divorce -as so many mothers from the ‘80s were. Whether she goes through with it or not you’ll just have to see. What I can say is that her character has a lot more character-work than season two in which she was terribly demoted to a desperate housewife.

but also by using this new bright colour palette to tell the story. When El is discovering the mall (Material Girl is Madonna’s best song to me) we, the audience, are taking it all in with her in full primary (techni)colour. But then, when dark things happen, or a character is depressed the wardrobe changes to earth-tones. And, as a bonus, when El is in ‘the dark zone’ her bright yellow outfit makes her stand out quite effectively.

I like to speculate that her shirt –which is yellow with black stripes on it-
symbolises her duality with this nether realm –being part of it (black)/not being part of it (yellow).

Now, it’s also the fourth of July. This ultimate, patriotism fuelled, American (“E pluribus unum”) holiday. This allows any storyteller to have a whole lot of fun. From visually having the kids recreate the statue of Iwo Jima. To, in narrative, having the Russians invade the U.S. of A.

The Russians are coming.
The Soviet-angle takes a bit of getting used to. Of course this is an all American show set during the cold-war so the Russians fit the bill as villains perfectly.

Even though the Soviets carrying big guns at a mall is a bit of a stretch.

But, for me, I always preferred the way the James Bond-franchise handled Russian villains. In that series it were always corrupt generals or rogue power-hungry officials, never actions santioned by the state. -Point in fact; the leader of the KGB (often played by Walter Gotell) came across as a charming fellow.

In Stranger Things season 3 the actions have to be state-approved because the amount of Soviet soldiers running amok and the giganticness of their operation couldn’t be done by a select crew of power-hungry madmen.

It’s this scope of things that stretches my willingness to believe a bit too far (without spoiling too much: how deep does the elevator go again?). There’s no way a Soviet covert operation could be this big. Which is a strange statement to make because we are talking about a show with a gargantuan inter-dimensional tentacle monster here.

No, for me a smaller operation (preferably without military uniforms) would’ve worked far better to sell this notion of ‘Ruskies invading’.

Still, on the other hand, with Soviet villains we now have the possibility of introducing a Dolph Lundgren-Arnold Schwarzenegger-Terminator –Soviet-super-fighter-who kills people Darth Vader-style. A million 80s references pasted upon a single one-dimensional character whose only motive is to be the unstoppable killing machine. Delicious!

Trilogies.
Like the above-mentioned Soviet super villain Stranger Things showcases itself once again as a master class of constant referencing whilst telling an ‘own’ story. Too many movies and shows get lost in the ‘constant winking’. Stranger Things still gets the balance right.

Though there is quite a bit of product placement going ‘round this time.

The old favourites are still there. Like the various references to: The Thing, Stephen King-movies, Spielberg’s ‘80s repertoire and the like. Then there are more obscure references to: The blob,

Wolfhard must’ve been thinking (after IT) with the Blob-monster escaping into the sewers: “not this shit again!”

Invasion of the body snatchers, Poltergeist (the little old lady Doris), The ambulance (or maybe Police squad), Die Hard,  Jaws, Evil dead, Magnum P.I., Alien(s), Dr. Strangelove: or how I stopped worrying and love the bomb, An American werewolf in London, National Lampoon’s Vacation, and, of course, the Neverending story.

There’s a Licence plate shown halfway through this season spelling: TODFHTR. The show explains it as: TOD FATHER (The Godfather). But I read it as: TO THE FURTHER! A reference to the Insidious-franchise; which plays with the same themes?

And, as the show started doing last season, the show runners can’t help themselves putting some references to ‘parts three of 80s trilogies’ into the mix too. So, of course there is a recreation of the tied-up odd-couple from Indiana Jones and the last crusade. The famous Alien-Ripley shot from Alien 3. The bulletproof vest from Back to the Future 3. And, Return of the Jedi gets mentioned by name (almost).

I think Mad Max: beyond thunderdome makes an appearance through Billy’s car.

Not to mention the fact that this season features three main villain groups: The Russians, The newspaper and the mindflayer.

It’s the cherry on top that the show runners just have to include. But, chances are quite likely that they’ll stop doing this next season. Because with season 4 we’ll be entering Halloween, Friday the 13th and Elmstreet’s territory of never-ending sequels.

Though I’m quite certain Freddy Krueger’s fourth adventure might get a mention.

A change is coming...
If season one feature one kiss, season two, two. Season three has a LOT of kisses in the first episode between the (now) teenagers Mike (Finn Wolfhard) and El (Millie Bobby Brown).

Eleven can speak actual sentences now, finally! She’s still wonderfully awkward though, about lots of stuff.

And ‘dad’ Hopper (David Harbour) isn’t pleased. I love his grumpiness. And I certainly love the dad-vibe of wanting to murder his daughter’s boyfriend -And this is not the only laugh out loud moment in the first episode. Each and every actor is now comfortable in their respective parts and how to play them.

Is El overpowered?
The problem with El is that she is overpowered.
Don’t forget that she snapped a man’s neck in season one almost as an afterthought. Yet, the audience doesn’t quite know how powerful she actually is. She closed the gateway to the Upside-Down with her mind. She splits monsters in two. But then, she is also overtaken by a mere human at one point during this third season. It’s a bit uneven. But, then, that rather fits with her character now both physically (puberty) as mentally (discovering the world around her).

Still, one fact remains; there is no real ‘feeling’ of danger for Mike and his friends if they have El watching their backs. So, from a narrative standpoint, what to do with her?

In season two the Duffer brothers smartly opted the Captain Marvel-technique. Just get El away from the town for the duration of the season. In season 3 a new trick is applied: ‘weaken her’.

The children are teenagers now so –by some unwritten Hollywood-rule- they are allowed to get hurt as much as adults. So El goes through a lot of pain which, in turn, disallows her to use her powers. A wonderful solution because now the danger lurking is very real because there isn’t a deus ex machina (El) to save the day.

My second point is the same one I made last season: El’s storyline is interwoven with Mike’s. The two kids love each other deeply. So, to tell a good story, the two need to be separated.

When they are together their storyline is finished (like Romeo and Juliette). It’s only when they are apart that their story becomes interesting. So, in the final episode, by taking them apart, the show is ready to move forward full throttle.

From a story perspective this is a logical choice: kids grow up. Now the show-runners get to play with all the puberty tropes of the ‘80s: “Mom get off the line!”, ‘Spin the bottle’, ‘girly-magazines featuring hunks’ and whatnot.

The show doesn’t let you forget the looming sexuality with small gags like Billy’s stack of porn magazines,
or the so-called: “Good screams” (that had me in stitches).

But puberty also allows the characters to change. Dustin (Gaten Matarazzo), always a tag-along character, now proactively takes charge of situations thrown at him.

The Bard.
Dustin has never gotten himself into serious problems. I don’t recall him getting hit at any point during the show (Lucas got some of Eleven’s fury in season one). Sure his pet ate his cat and he had to watch his friend jump off a cliff. But he, himself, never got hurt.

That’s the fate of the bard; he’ll be the one surviving the longest.

Like Mickey Doyle in Boardwalk Empire.

And we love him for it. He’s the character the show relies must upon to lighten the mood when things get too dark. If not by him purring like a cat throughout season two, then this season has one brilliant scene in the finale that is pitch perfect in every way.

Mike actually, gets to be a bit of a douche after two-seasons of being goodie-two shoes. Lucas (Caleb McLaughlin), then, starts to portray himself as ‘Mr. Know-it-all’/’Dr. Love’ where, before, he was just as insecure as the other guys. And Max (Sadie Sink), gleefully grabs the chance to be ‘girly’ with El for a change instead of the tomboy she usually is. Whilst El, in turn, gets to define herself.

Turning to the other characters ‘their change’ comes from the events of seasons previous. Steve ‘The Hair’ Harrington (Joe Keery), for instance, seems to have accepted his dethronement and is now willing to let go of his ‘cool façade’.

And, of course, Steve gets beaten up again (but he does win one fight this season, so there’s that).

Nathalie Dyer’s Nancy, then –already a strong woman since season one- takes on the challenging storyline of a woman trying to make it in a man’s world (being an intern sucks for some people).

A story of all ages that works in every time-setting.
Even though her storyline ultimately results in failure it is a failure of the character, not gender.

Her story is short and powerful, but quickly left aside. Then again, it does touch upon the various equality issues Stranger Things often likes to highlight.

Getting to the ‘elders’, Joyce (Winona Ryder), of course, leaps into her trademark madness from the very first episode on (her house stays intact, though). This woman has seen enough strange stuff going on around her that she has developed a six sense; and she’s not afraid to pick a fight now instead of waiting until it lands on her doorstep.

Winona Ryder is loving her part!

The show actually increases on this since Joyce and Hopper start to define themselves as a great detective team: She brings the cases, solves most of them through her smarts. He’s there to take the punches.

The only character (apart from Hopper) that doesn’t want to change, however, is Will (Noah Schnapp).

Will starts this season with the more interesting storyline for me because he has this direct link to the mindflayer. As I said in an earlier review he and Eleven are the ying and yang of the show. Him light being brought to the dark (place). She from the dark being brought to the light.

He tries to move on but he still has this scar of the time he lost. And even though the boy’s trying to play catch-up with two years stolen from his life he quickly learns that the world around him has moved on. It’s a gut punch for him. Not only did he lose time but he’s also behind on the present.


To end, however, with a critique on the season; the minute Will, Nancy and Jonathan’s (Charlie Heaton) storylines are over they are demoted to standing in the background whilst the other characters do their thing.

The new kids on the block.
A new season also means new characters. The most obvious ones being the villains. We’ve got three human villains this time ‘round (season 3). The Soviets embodied by the (above mentioned) The Terminator-super soldier and his general, the mayor and the wise-cracking A-holes at ‘The Post’.

The mayor is played deliciously by Cary Elwes. He plays the character at his most charming, chewing scenery every chance he gets. From the moment Hopper getting hopping on him -When Stranger Things brings a smack-down it brings it. Like the wine-bottle an episode before it.

The use of American Pie -which is basically a song about (a dead rock-star) letting go- is a stroke of brilliance in that scene.

You know that he’s one of the big evil players (perhaps even a Soviet spy) who is utterly detestable to boot. Therefore it is a bit of a shame that the rest of the season downplays the character to a ‘rather’ Wormtongue status. But, who knows, maybe he returns in season 4 to ‘REALLY’ mess things up.

Jake Bushey’s white-collar-A-hole, then, has a more complete storyline. He’s just a terrible chauvinistic person who loves to kick people when they are down. It’s a great human villain turn for him because he usually plays a bit larger than life.

Here he sticks to being a (stupid) human. And it’s only later in the season that the show allows him to become a bit grander in evoking the ‘danger that lurks within’ that he plays so well (the Die Hard-call-back-scene).

In retrospect it might be a small part, but a very satisfying one nonetheless.

Billy (Dacre Montgomery), then, doesn’t really fit in this category. He actually turns out to be a great villain, though (some great writing and acting here) with a wonderful speech near the end. Though, I must admit that the flashbacks of Billy’s abusive childhood was a bit ‘I know’ (but needed).

The good guys.
New seasons often include new good characters (that need a storyline as well). This is a tricky business because the more characters you have the less screen-time left to tell ‘full’ stories per character. Moreover, the minute a good character has completed his/her storyline you have to get rid of said character; but how to do that?

The Walking Dead simply kills them.

So when you introduce a new character the best choice to make is to have the character ‘removable in the easy sense’.

Take Lucas’s younger sister Erica (Priah Ferguson) for instance. She is needed for the story of ‘Season 3’. But next season (like Kali/eight [Linnea Berthelsen] season last) she can quickly be pushed back to the background when she isn’t needed.

To sidetrack a bit, I disliked her character immensely during the first few episodes. It’s like the show upped her daily dosage of annoyance. She’s a bully and I don’t like bullies. But –and this is the magic Stranger Things does- she grows on you. By the end of the season I’ve started to enjoy her snarky comments. If she comes back next season I want some more brother and sister dynamics.

Back on track, however, I would argue that Robin (Maya Hawke) as Steve’s colleague at Scoops Ahoy, is a whole different story. By the end of the season she is intertwined with the character Steve. She’s here to stay. Is this a bad thing? Not at all!

Robin is a great addition; she’s instantly likable, strong and not afraid to speak her mind. Also the simple fact that she and Steve had to go through the entire season in a silly sailor’s outfit helped in that regard.

A new map – It’s Christmas!
In episode four the show shows the audience a full map of Hawkins (a dated one but still). I, for one, would like to believe that the producers threw it in there to please me (personally), since it’s pretty similar to my map.  But I doubt it. It’s a nice fantasy though.

At least I can say for a fact that the show-runners have decided to make Hawkins ‘tangible’. By now there’s a basic ‘stage’ set that both limits and inspires the show. You can’t have ‘our heroes’ make it from the Byers house all the way to the police station in the blink of an eye now; there needs to be some time in-between. This time allows for scenes to happen. Knowing what the stage is (I believe) enhances drama.

Mission: child endangerment.
As always the newest season of Stranger Things feels like ‘the 80s’. Right down to the post effect of an artist putting scanned film over the digital footage to make it look more dated.

I absolutely adored the ‘kick-the-trashcan’-scene which was all shot in the infamous ‘80s Dutch angle.

But there’s a difference between being made in the 21st century and the 1980s. For starters: I’m not very lenient, nowadays, when it comes down to ‘convenient coincidences’ as the finale episode threw in a bit too many. After almost 150 years of movies this should stop.

Also the constant driving back-and-forth meddled with the ‘tempo’ of this last episode a bit.

Other critiques are the fact that the ‘off the air’ Dustin gets brushed off a little too easily for my taste (doesn’t this close-knit group of friends want to look for him when sh*t hits the fan?). And the fact that there are a lot of flashbacks this season that aren’t always needed.

Even some from a few episodes ago. Do the Duffer brothers really think I’m not bench-watching this thing?

But this is all just nitpicking.

Overall I enjoyed this season very much. Especially the new direction of the characters. For example: Mike isn’t perfect and he never will be. He is, however, a good boy –just like his friends. So why not make him a bit more ‘aggressive’ this season? It all adds up to the character-development that any long-running show needs.

I also enjoyed the bloodiness of the season (actual exploding rats). I’m not a big fan of blood if it’s unnecessary

You won’t see me revisiting Hostel anytime soon because I enjoy watching people get tortured (the story is fun though).

but a little bit of blood here and there just to emphasize the danger that is lurking helps to increase the tension.

Also the usage of ‘grouping’ works a charm. More so, than seasons previous, this third season of Stranger Things quickly divides the characters into teams. The Dustin/Steve-team, the El/Max-team, the boys-team, and team-Hopper. Like LOST, Heroes, and many shows before it this ‘trick’ works marvellously. It allows the show to focus all its attention on the character-development of the current team they are highlighting.

As a bonus, then, the show quickly separates Mike and El. Their story is over (they love each other, there’s nothing left to tell) so they should only come back together when a new outside event comes to show. In the end, they can only be ‘truly’ together when the whole ordeal is over.

It’s important to separate the two otherwise the viewers will lose interest in their relationship.
This happened in Friends, Lost, Cheers, and many, many other shows.

As the Duffer brothers teased last season they wanted to tie up the previous story before they leapt into the next. And leapt they did! Season 3 of Stranger Things is left rather open in the end. The next season can’t come soon enough. But until that happens we might compose a question or two...

All that’s left is...speculation.
I did pretty well in my article about the season 3 trailer. I got a lot of things right. So, since I love mind games and speculation let me just use this final bit to draw out some ideas that might play out in the fourth season of Stranger Things. Of course this bit will be spoiler heavy:

1. It is probably going to be set around Christmastime. Two very simple arguments for this: Stranger Things is now fully committed on featuring an American holiday during each season (Halloween last season). And, two, the mindflayer doesn’t like heat.

2. Now that Will and El are brother and sister we will probably gets some nice scenes between the two. She helping him in some way. Be it girls, or –what I always wanted for the boy- awakening his dormant powers (he plays a wizard in D and D after all).

It might be a boy Will is interested in. Fine either way.

I know we got the ‘evil Will’ last season but I’m still speculating that his long time in the ‘upside-down’ gave him a bit more tricks up his sleeve. Which was, of course, confirmed this season with him having the ability to sense the mindflayer’s presence (something El apparently can’t).

3. El has lost her powers. How about that? From a narrative perspective this is a very, very good thing! Now the dangers can be built upon for real since she has no way of defending herself. Is the mindflayer draining her power?

4. Where do the Byers go? Chicago? If so El might meet her sister Kali/eight once more.

5.  Hopper isn’t dead. I’d be quite surprised if he is. He’s either in that Russian cell or somewhere in the Upside-down.

6. Can we PLEASE have Rutger Hauer and Jeroen Krabbe next season (the latter being the villain). Both playing Russians…obviously.

I actually wrote this above bit two days before I learned of Rutger Hauer’s demise.
The world won’t be the same without him.
He was an instinctive, caring, charming, down-to-earth,
yet occasionally willingly crazy-person and we all loved him for it.

Hauer was a man who chose acting as a profession to tell interesting tales.
He couldn’t be bothered by all the tomfoolery of Hollywood of making the actors ‘stars’
and putting them on the forefront; it was the actual movie that mattered for him.
His love for the craft shone through in every single role he took on.
Rutger Hauer was both a good human and a movie actor –giving his all to the tale.

...Are we right? We’ll see. One thing’s for sure: Stranger Things is as solid as ever and it will take quite the Demogorgon to take it away!

Oh, I didn’t mention ‘conspiracy guy’ (Murray) (Brett Gelman) and ‘Smirnov’ (Alexei) (Alec Utgoff)!
Do I need to? They were awesome!

Netflix versus Disney+
Is Netflix going down due to the upcoming Disney+? Or is Netflix going to survive since it has such a strong brand and Disney is never going to be able to compete?

Most stockbrokers are betting on Disney to be the victor. This company has the biggest portfolio of blockbuster movies that Netflix simply doesn’t have to offer.

I disagree (for now). I believe that the variety that Netflix has to offer will overcome Disney+’s features that ‘everybody has seen already!’

Yet, this ‘danger on the horizon’ has fittingly been incorporated in this season of Stranger Things! As all the shops in downtown Hawkins are abandoned in favour of the Starcourt mall. So, today (in 2019), many stores had to close their doors in favour of ‘Internet shopping’. Netflix might follow the same path.

But what will the future hold? Will the little video-rental Netflix have to close its doors due to the megalomaniac Disney company? If this is the case Netflix won’t be able to produce again...

A danger for Stranger Things.

But, then again, nothing Mike and his pals can’t overcome.

Missing Link – a review

Sir Lionel Frost (Hugh Jackman) a crypto zoologist receives a letter from Bigfoot (Zach Galifianakis) himself. Together they go on a journey to find the hairy bloke’s family in the Himalaya’s. But, there are evil forces at play that want nothing better than to thwart the plans of our heroes every step of the way.

And Laika has done it again! With a stronger, more action driven story than their (almost perfect) last outing Kubo and the two strings, Missing Link delivers a wonderful odd-couple movie with a heart.

Normally Laika is troublesome to place because their movies often contain a certain amount of darkness (Coraline for instance). Missing Link, I would argue, breaks the mould a bit as it is more light-hearted than their previous outings.

This, because, the message of ‘family can be found in the oddest of places’ is played out exactly as it has been done numerous times before (e.g. The guardians of the galaxy, Lethal Weapon 4, or, even further back, the first rendition of The secret garden). But that shouldn’t spoil the fun.

So here I am about to embark on a lavish review in which I will most likely lose myself in praise. But before I do that, maybe a nitpick or two.

Picking the flees
Like Kubo before it the story of Missing Link is a bit back and forth. I call it the 'Pirates of the Caribbean-conundrum' since it was in that movie that I first noticed it. Basically the idea is that some movies tent to move all over the map. So in the first Pirates: the troupe goes back and forth to the treasure-cave. It’s this constant revisiting to places that the heroes willingly left that doesn’t always work.

Missing Link does this as well as the story takes us from London, towards Washington State U.S.A., back to London towards India (why not take a steamer at the west coast?). It doesn’t quite work on a narrative level.

Then there’s the character of Sir Frost who is also slightly amiss. He starts off as a swashbuckler adventurer who cares a great deal about the ones around him and then, suddenly, he’s told by Adelina Fortnight (Zoe Saldana) that he doesn’t, in fact, care.

This has to do with a lack of some sort of betrayal scene (like Judy Hopps accidentally did in Zootopia’s third act) between him and Mr. Link. They start off as friends and they stay friends throughout their adventure.

Are these terrible, movie-wrecking things I mentioned: no absolutely not! When one is dealing with a Laika movie you are likely going to set the bar extremely high. And still Missing Link manages to pass with flying colours; especially when you start to think about the craftsmanship involved.

Stop motion
Every behind-the-scenes- featurette they say it again. Laika isn’t so much a movie studio as it is a workshop of a collection of ‘crazy scientists’. Each and every day they try to find a solution to a problem posed. Be it animating water, rain, fire or something people take for granted -like giving characters believable facial expressions! The actors delivering the lines is one thing but if the animation doesn’t fit their words the illusion is gone.

I don’t know how the magicians at Laika did it and I don’t really want to know. Looking at the behind-the-scenes footage you’ll often see a lot of green screens. So, you might figure that there is quite a bit of computer-graphics involved. But then, when you start to break-down the scene you’ll quickly notice that it’s ALL stop-motion. The green screens are merely there to put one stop-motion sequence over another.

That’s one of the reasons why stop-motion resonates with movie-buffs (like me) so much. We want to know how things are done –yet, at the same time we don’t- and are amazed when a moviemaker manages an impressive feat with simple tricks without ‘cheatingly’ using the computer.

It’s a rather dual way of thinking that Laika positions itself in for me, but it pays off every time.
Just take the sea scenes, for instance. For years water was terribly difficult to animate on a computer (just look at the intro to King’s Quest VI). Nowadays we’ve got all kinds of algorism to pull it off quite effectively. So much so that ‘water scenes’ are often the easiest to animate (e.g. the shipwreck scene in Frozen).

But what does Laika do? Does it make use of twenty years of CGI water animation? Of course not! They make an intricate device to mimic the flow of water on screen in a controllable fashion (frame-by-frame).
This is insane! And this is the dedication that pours from the screen in every single shot!

Acting
We’ve come a long way since Snow white and the seven dwarfs as the behind-the-scenes footage of Missing Link shows us: the actors performed several intonations of the same line. They did this before a single frame was shot and returned once or twice when principle photography had begun. Criticasters might state that it sounds like an easy pay check.

Are they right? Or should we then praise the actors for their investment of the parts? I do think we should! By casting these actors the studio relied on them to fill in the parts. To create the characters. The actors therefore become part of the storytelling.

In ‘normal’ movies this is where the term ‘creative differences’ often pops up.

Nobody else but Zach Galifianakis could’ve played Mr. Link with his childishly positive yet courageous persona. The actor shaped the character. And the animation and character design, therefore, came from the actor’s performance.

All the actors do their best and it shows. My personal favourite scene is the banter between Stephen Fry as the villain Lord Piggot-Dunceby and Hugh Jackman’s Sir Lionel Frost. It’s witty, it’s fast and Jackman is enjoying himself tremendously speaking the Queens.

Visually
Quite the intricate device for what is basically a ‘butt joke’.
But, when dealing with a Laika film it is the visual side of the movie that is on the forefront. The voices of the characters move to the background in favour of the ‘whole’ (as it should be). Each new movie this studio bring out amazes you by the amount of love-for-details that the crew brought to their new epic. Even if Missing Link is a rather ‘small’ story its epicenes shows through every single shot by just the insane amount of (moving) elements present. It is, however, the style of Missing Link that might put you off.

The sets of Missing Link look amazing and ‘real’ (in contrast to the ‘crooked’ sets of Coraline). But it are the characters that look more cartoonish than Laika’s previous movies. This might take a bit of getting used to. Still, again, the emotional animation combined with the voice-work makes you quickly forget that.

And, with such a joyful story and so much love for depicting it this is an easy hurdle to overcome.

Found the Missing Link
Missing Link is, by far, Laika’s most accessible movie. There is no real dark heart to find in this adventurous tale of good overcoming evil and finding your family along the way.

Sure, there are two or three nitpicks. And, yes, -me being an adult who loves dark and scary stories- I would’ve preferred the studio to take the Coraline, Paranorman-path again. But the minute the charming Sir Lionel Frost is on screen, ten seconds in, you are willing to give yourself over to the spectacular tale these moviemakers-par-excellence have created.