Every once
in a while a movie pops up that has everybody talking for a day or two.
And...then it's totally forgotten. Compliance is such a movie. It had great
reviews a few years back and nowadays you really have to search to find it.
None of my movie-buff friends have seen it. And that's strange because it is a
really great movie. True, I'm a big fan of movies that take place in a singular
location (like a play) so that's already a plus for me. But the fascinating
story and the great acting to support it also caused me to become emotionally
involved in the movie.
The story in short:
The manager of a fast-food establishment gets a call from a so-called police officer who tells her that one of her workers has stolen from a client. If she would be so kind to investigate.
That's
basically all you need to know about the story. And I hope common sense has
kicked in while you read the above because it isn't common practice for the
police to ask other people to do their work for them.
So there's
something not-quite-right from the get go and that's where the title:
Compliance gets dark. Because the characters either follow the phone-officer's
demands (almost) to the letter without hesitation or step back to let somebody
else do the dirty work. And each new task gets darker and darker.
Now, me
sitting on the sofa (you sitting on the sofa) might wonder during this movie why
somebody would do such a thing without second guessing? This simple blind
reliance to a voice on a phone.
And, I
must admit, near the end the movie does take the leap so far out there that it
is hard to suspend disbelief that anyone would actually go on with the requests
(though, according to the credits, there have been several cases in the US).
There are
several psychological games interwoven in the script like peer pressure and
authority figures to make this happen. And we all know that ol' test of the guy
in the white coat asking to: "press the button again".
The
experiment was as such. An actor was placed in a chair and each time a button
was pushed he would howler out in pain as if he was electrocuted (fake of
course -he was a good actor). So random people -oblivious to the fact that this
was an actor- came in and their guide asked them to push the button. The actor
would subsequently cry out in 'pain'. Then those people would be asked to press
the button again. Now, if the man asking was wearing a lab coat (= authority
figure) chances of people pressing the button again were much higher than if
the man asking was wearing a normal suit. This tells you something about the
influence simple clothing can have.
There's an
old joke based on this story - so here it goes.
Three
candidates for the CIA (two men and a woman) are up for the final test of their
training. The first man enters the room and his teacher tells him: "Inside
the next room is you fiance. Here's a gun, you've got five minutes to kill
her!".
The man
goes inside and after three minutes he comes out crying that he simply cannot
do it.
"Too
bad for you." The teacher tells him "You're going home. Wait here and
keep you mouth shut!"
Then the
second man enters and the teacher gives him a gun and tells him: "Inside
the next room is your wife. You've got five minutes to kill her!".
Again,
after four minutes the man comes out and confesses that he cannot kill his
beloved.
"Too
bad for you." The teacher repeats "You're going home. Wait here and
keep you mouth shut!"
Then the
woman enters. She's handed a gun with the mission to kill her husband. While
she's inside the teacher tells the men: "Oh, don't you worry lads, the gun
I handed you only fires blanks. Do you really think we would ask something like
that from you?"
A minute
later the woman comes out, completely out of breath: "Tha-that..."
She began. "That gun you gave me only fires blanks, I had to strangle
Harvey with my brazier!".
But top
that off with three dimensional characters and you've one heck of a
psychological thriller going. Not only because you can somehow understand why
this character would go this far. But also because you look at yourself and
wonder: 'would I do this?'. Which brings me to the sucker punch of the finale.
In the end all the characters are still three dimensional -with which I mean to
say that- it isn't your standard Hollywood fare wherein the 'villain'
recognizes or learn from his or her mistakes. No, they were following orders
and apparently that makes you just as much a victim. Just to be clear: No it
does not clear you from what you did!
But that's
basically the cherry on top of a movie that delves deep into humans
(psychological) need to follow orders. Even if it is just a voice on the phone.
No comments:
Post a Comment